Taking somebody’s life is really a heinous crime that devastates households, communities, and society in general. The severe punishment serves for a deterrent to potential offenders and seeks to copyright the sanctity of human life.
“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon by the prosecution against the petitioner and his previously mentioned mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined through the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated 2-12-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and consist of all notable cases decided via the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
twelve. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is predicted that the persons obtaining their character previously mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are for being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is often a condition precedent for appointment to some Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to your Government service will be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to do away with the candidature in the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: 15-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the law when it truly is unclear the way it applies to any provided situation, frequently rendering judgments based to the intent of lawmakers plus the circumstances of the case at hand. Such decisions become a guide for future similar cases.
Power to levy tax and to legislate on immovable property which include tax on annual rental value of immovable property after 18th Amendment(CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973)
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle founded by a court, which other courts are obligated to comply with.
This ruling has conditions, and Because the petitioners failed a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based on the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances on the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 from the Constitution. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-223999 Tag:Given the legal analysis on the subject issue, we've been in the view that the claim in the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle is not legally seem, Other than promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They may be subject matter to rules and regulations When the recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case from the petitioners for promotion may be deemed, however, we're very clear within our point of view that contractual service cannot be thought of for seniority and promotion since the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum fitness, issue to availability of vacancy subject to your approval in the competent authority.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
115 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi check here As far as the stance on the respondents that pensionary benefits could be withheld on account from the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section twenty of your Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does provide for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. These involve if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension might be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension may very well be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set because of the government.